My First Million cover
Entrepreneurship

3 low competition businesses with massive demand in America

My First Million

Hosted by Unknown

58 min episode
8 min read
5 key ideas
Listen to original episode

Food businesses that do marketing compete on price; marketing businesses that sell food print money — and a 3-person Minnesota ice cream shop proves it with…

In Brief

Food businesses that do marketing compete on price; marketing businesses that sell food print money — and a 3-person Minnesota ice cream shop proves it with 40–50% margins.

Key Ideas

1.

Food marketing outperforms food selling

Food businesses that do marketing compete on price; marketing businesses that sell food print money.

2.

Small payouts validate creator viability

A $10 payout validates a creator more than you'd think — income replacement is the wrong goal.

3.

Enterprise buyers bet their careers

Enterprise buyers buy with their career in mind, not their company's ROI.

4.

Clips drive viewership and revenue

Clips are the product; the full show is just how you make them.

5.

Food freedom creates unexplored markets

Food freedom laws in Texas and Arizona just opened a legal market most founders are ignoring.

Why does it matter? Because the low-competition businesses that print money all work by rejecting the default model

Three founders walked in with businesses most people would dismiss — an alien AI companion for Midwestern moms, a pre-order ice cream operation running at SaaS margins, and a clip-automation tool quietly eating the RSS feed. What ties them together is a single pattern: they found room to operate by ignoring the assumptions everyone else accepts. No walk-ups. No cold chatbot interface. No RSS-first strategy. The constraint most operators treat as a problem turns out to be the moat.

  • A pickup-only food business with three employees can run at 40–50% profit margins — better than most software companies
  • Enterprise buyers don't close on ROI; they close on whether you'll help them get promoted
  • 50,000x more people watch the clip than the full show, and big advertisers already know it
  • Food freedom laws in Texas and Arizona just quietly created a legal home-food market that almost no one has found yet

Enterprise buyers aren't buying your product — they're buying a promotion

The pitch that never worked: here's your ROI. Sam knows. He closed seven-figure advertising deals and watched the ROI argument stall every time. What finally moved the needle? "Wining and dining worked. Making them say like, you have this budget. You have to spend it. Spend it with me. It's safe."

Jonathan from Overlap named the principle directly after cracking enterprise sales himself: "The people who are buying your product are thinking about their job first and foremost. And then how do you get those people to get promoted? Like basically you're selling here's how I'm going to get you promoted."

Shaan added the mechanism. Know what metrics the VP gets measured on. Then deliver reporting that makes their contribution clearly visible and attributable. "Way more than ROI. It's trust and being like, will I help you get promoted?"

A VP at a media company isn't evaluated on whether your software made the company profitable. They need to hit their KPIs and not take a risky bet. Map every product benefit to that calculus. Make attribution easy to screenshot and forward. You're not selling software — you're selling a safe yes.

A three-person ice cream operation in Minnesota earns SaaS-level margins by refusing to let anyone walk up

Toz Creamery in Hopkins, Minnesota does six to seven figures a year at 40–50% profit margins. Three or four employees. Zero walk-up customers. Instagram and Hot Plate as the storefront. Pre-order only, pickup only, sells out every week.

Rishi from Hot Plate said it plainly: "That's like a SaaS company." He's right. Strip out restaurant overhead — the rent exposure, idle labor, food waste from unpredictable foot traffic — and the unit economics transform completely. Every unit is sold before it's made. There's no overstock, no markdown, no race-to-close with a walk-in customer who might leave.

The no-walk-up rule isn't a constraint. It's what creates scarcity. When demand is structurally above supply, customers line up to buy rather than waiting to be convinced. The owner doesn't compete on price because price isn't the conversation. This is a demand management problem, not a hospitality problem — and demand management is a much better business.

Two kinds of food businesses exist — and only one has pricing power

Rishi put it in a single line: "There are food businesses that do marketing, and marketing businesses that sell food. If you're a marketing business that sells food, you have no price elasticity."

Butter and Crumble in San Francisco has a three-hour walk-up line every day and a 20,000-person waitlist for their pre-order drops. Customers aren't comparison shopping — they're trying to get in before it closes. The jacked bodybuilder who makes cheat-meal cookies sells out in seconds through Instagram alone. Same model, different product. Both built the audience before the product scaled. The product sells into an audience that already wants it.

The distinction explains why some food brands never compete on price and others spend their lives fighting for margin. Build the audience first. The audience is the pricing power — and the drop mechanic that makes customers race rather than deliberate is what makes it print.

Wrapping AI in a voice-first alien with persistent memory unlocked 100,000 paying subscribers ChatGPT can't reach

Tolen — an app where you customize your own alien companion powered by AI — has 100,000+ paying subscribers, mostly 35-to-45-year-old moms, mostly Midwest. Monthly revenue is comfortably seven figures. The founder didn't predict this demographic. "That is literally our audience. You nailed it."

ChatGPT has hundreds of millions of users. Almost none pay. The gap: "Most people are using it for productivity, draft email, maybe they asked a question to it as a smarter Google — but they never subscribed so they didn't get the full experience." Tolen's founder built directly into that space.

The unlock is voice — 70%+ of messages on Tolen happen through voice. The character mirrors your communication style down to whether you swear or write in full sentences. It remembers what you said and brings it back at the right moment. The subreddit's top post: "I've never had a single person in my life who has given as much as this stupid adorable bot."

The persona is the moat. The largest AI user segment isn't tech workers who want productivity — it's everyday people who find raw LLMs cold and transactional. Character, voice, and memory are what reach them.

Clips are the product. The full show is just how you make them.

Jimmy told it to Joe Rogan: 50,000 times more people watch the clip than the full show. Jonathan from Overlap said it even more directly: "These shows are basically consumed via clips on social feeds. That's the end product."

Big brands have already repriced this. The RSS feed ad is "a nice throw-in," Jonathan said. What they actually want: to be in the clip, on the feed, associated with a creator. "They think of you as a creator. They don't think of you as a podcaster." He added that RSS is "a very outdated technology that advertisers don't like because it's extremely hard to measure."

Sam pushed back — long-form listeners are far more loyal. Someone stops him on the street about a throwaway comment he made at minute 45. The clip audience is "a lot more fly by." Both things are true. The volume gap, though, isn't close. Structure content to produce great standalone clips first. Renegotiate ad deals to include social clip placements as a required deliverable — not a bonus throw-in.

Creator platforms that stop at money churn creators. The retention levers are fame, love, and inspiration.

Shaan relayed the Twitch playbook from Emmett Shear: creators need four things — money, fame, love, and inspiration — and the money bar is lower than anyone expects. "If I could get somebody even like a $10 payout, they felt validated for what they were doing and it kept them going for way longer."

Income replacement is the wrong target. The goal is validation, plus three other things: fame (building their audience), love (feeling the audience care), and inspiration (seeing what other creators are doing on the same platform so you know what's possible). Skip those three and the $10 payout doesn't stick.

For Hot Plate, Sam's advice was specific: take the top 50 chefs, make them so aspirational that the next 50,000 home cooks want to be them. Feature them on lists. Tell the human stories. Give home food sellers a tribe identity that isn't "chef" — a word that already means something else and requires too much work to reframe.

Texas expanded its food freedom laws. You can now sell almost anything from your home. Arizona opened dairy rules. Home cafes are proliferating in Yuma — actual coffee shops operating out of residential kitchens, fully legal.

Rishi mentioned this almost in passing, but it's the regulatory tailwind under everything Hot Plate is building. Cottage food laws already existed. The expansion changes the addressable market: what was limited to baked goods and jams becomes a legal platform for serious home food businesses — the kind running at 40–50% margins with three employees.

A regulatory shift is as consequential for market creation as a new platform API. The founders who notice before the category gets crowded capture it. This one is open right now.

The edge is always hiding in the constraint everyone else avoids

All three businesses got here the same way: they found the assumption everyone else accepted and ignored it. No walk-ups. No utilitarian chatbot. No full-show-first content strategy. The pattern is consistent — the constraint most operators work around is often the thing that makes the business defensible. The regulatory version of this is playing out right now in Texas and Arizona, wide open, almost entirely uncrowded. First mover isn't about timing. It's about noticing.


Topics: food entrepreneurship, creator economy, AI companions, enterprise sales, video content, social media clips, business models, SaaS margins, home-based business, regulatory opportunity, consumer AI, creator platforms

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between food businesses that do marketing and marketing businesses that sell food?
Food businesses that do marketing compete on price; marketing businesses that sell food print money. This concept is proven by a 3-person Minnesota ice cream shop achieving 40–50% margins—dramatically higher than typical food industry standards. The distinction lies in business positioning: rather than competing as a traditional food company on product quality and price, you position the enterprise as a marketing-driven venture using food as the distribution vehicle. This repositioning fundamentally changes how customers perceive value, your pricing power, and competitive dynamics, enabling margins that most food businesses never achieve.
Should creators prioritize short-form clips or full-length content?
Clips are the product; the full show is just how you make them. This principle inverts conventional content strategy where full-length work is the primary deliverable. Instead, short-form clips become your actual product, with longer-form content serving purely as raw material for clip extraction. This framework optimizes for algorithmic distribution, maximizes viewer engagement, and increases viral potential across platforms. By reframing what you're actually producing, you align your strategy with platform incentives and audience consumption patterns, making clip quality the true measure of success rather than total watch time.
What market opportunity do food freedom laws in Texas and Arizona create?
Food freedom laws in Texas and Arizona just opened a legal market most founders are ignoring. These regulations permit small-scale food production without expensive commercial kitchen facilities, eliminating traditional barriers to entry. The work suggests this creates significant opportunity for entrepreneurs who understand the regulatory landscape and move quickly. Most founders remain unaware of this opportunity, positioning early entrants to potentially capture substantial market share before competition intensifies and regulations potentially tighten. This represents a rare convergence of regulatory opportunity and founder inattention.
How important is early monetization when validating a creator business?
A $10 payout validates a creator more than you'd think — income replacement is the wrong goal. Even minimal revenue demonstrates real customer willingness to pay, which validates product-market fit more reliably than engagement metrics alone. Rather than aiming for full-time income immediately, prioritize gathering evidence that customers will exchange money for your work. This validation-first approach shifts focus from revenue targets to meaningful customer signals, providing a stronger foundation for sustainable growth. Early monetization proves concept viability and gives strategic clarity for scaling decisions.

Read the full summary of 3 low competition businesses with massive demand in America on InShort