My First Million cover
Entrepreneurship

Proof that your weird hobby might be worth more than your corporate job

My First Million

Hosted by Unknown

57 min episode
10 min read
5 key ideas
Listen to original episode

Stop trying to be the best — a perfume tour guide, a horse blogger, and LeBron James all got rich by being the only one.

In Brief

Stop trying to be the best — a perfume tour guide, a horse blogger, and LeBron James all got rich by being the only one.

Key Ideas

1.

Content Brand Beats In-Person Service

Your in-person service is just raw material — the content brand is the real business.

2.

Own Your Market Through Uniqueness

Personal monopoly beats generic excellence every time; be the only, not the best.

3.

Find Customers Who Can't Leave

Horse owners will go broke before selling their horse — find that audience.

4.

Retain IP Rights Create Wealth

Dolly turned down Elvis, kept her IP, and made tens of millions when Whitney sang it.

5.

Strategic Debt Provides Tax Benefits

LeBron borrowed $300M tax-free against his Nike contract — debt isn't income.

Why does it matter? Because the weirdos with niche obsessions are quietly building empires while the generalists grind

A perfume guide with 15,000 followers, a horse-media company nobody has heard of, and LeBron James all ran the same underrated playbook — and Shaan and Sam reverse-engineer exactly why your weird hobby might be the most defensible business you will ever own.

  • The real business is not the in-person service — it is the content brand it generates, and flipping that model unlocks a ceiling the service alone can never reach
  • Be the only beats be the best every time; a personal monopoly puts you in a category where no direct comparison exists
  • Obsessive niche audiences spend through pain — horse owners will skip rent before selling their horse, and the company that figured that out sold for $300 million
  • Dolly Parton turned down Elvis to keep her song, and made tens of millions in royalties when Whitney Houston sang it instead

The in-person experience is not the product — it is the content farm

Shaan's core framework for Asia Grant's perfume tour business: the content is the business, not the tours. So the tours are just content. Most service operators make content to drive bookings. The smarter flip is treating every client interaction as a content shoot — you have to say the tour is just actors — and building the brand online as the primary asset.

The ceiling on in-person experiences is geographic and physical. The ceiling on a brand is not.

Alex Hormozi's $5,000 in-person workshops probably do $10M a year. But that is not the actual business. He is using that as a farm system to produce clips and content and the content grows his brand. He is going to make way more off his brand being famous than he is off those workshops in the end. Jack's Dining Room runs the same play. So did the mafia tour guy who built to $1M on Airbnb experiences and then sold the listing.

You make more being famous for the thing than running the thing.

Stop trying to be the best — be the only, and that is how you eventually become the best

Asia Grant's Instagram bio: I have a perfume for you. The best New York City perfume tour. Shaan's read: she is not competing to be the best — she is just the only. And that is how you become the best, because no direct comparison is possible.

You whittle away the generic parts of what you do until it is really the thing that you do well and you will be the best one because nobody else is the same as you and you are in a market of one.

David Perrell calls this a personal monopoly — you are known for something so specific that the category is you. Nick Gray ran it twice. Museum Hack grew to $2.9M in revenue and he sold it. Then he reinvented as the two-hour cocktail party guy — a thing that sounds trivially stupid — wrote the definitive book, sold hundreds of thousands of copies. Two separate personal monopolies, same person.

Asia Grant is on her way to being the New York City perfume person. All she has to do is stack specificity layers until nobody can walk into that category without walking into her. The embarrassing niche part is not the weakness. That is the moat.

A horse-media company nobody has heard of just sold for $300 million

$85 million a year in revenue. High 20s profit margins. 200 employees. You have almost certainly never heard of the Equin Network.

Sam brought this one. In the early 2000s, two guys named Andy and Tom started buying niche magazines — sailing, a few others — then went all-in on horse owners. Not racing. Not equestrian sport. Just people who own horses. They built out an entire ecosystem: Ride TV, a $200-a-year streaming network for roping events; a fly-control subscription with 45,000 customers each spending around $300 a year to keep flies off their horse; the AAA for horse trailers; the largest roping event in the country. They just got bought for $300 million. The former president and CEO of WWE is now helping run the thing because they think equestrian entertainment is the next big media play.

The reason it works is the audience. These people who own horses will go broke — they will not pay their rent before they give up their horse. Obsessive audiences spend through pain that would make any casual consumer walk away.

Before dismissing any niche as too small, run the horse test: would these people prioritize this over rent? If yes, you have found something real.

LeBron borrowed $300 million tax-free against his Nike contract using a structure almost no athlete has tried

Debt is not income. That is the entire move.

LeBron has a lifetime Nike deal. His money manager — same person handling Beyoncé's wealth — dusted off a trick David Bowie used in the nineties: securitize the future income stream as a bond instead of selling it. They created an LLC called King James Funding, structured a 30-year bond at a sub-5% coupon, and pulled $300 million up front.

He basically owes 5% interest but he got $300 million up front. He does not pay tax on the $300 million. So he gets $300 million outright that he can use to invest or do other things.

He did not sell the Nike contract. He borrowed against it. All the future upside stays his — the bond is just a loan secured by those future payments. A credit agency rated it better than US Treasuries. Bowie raised $50 million the same way. LeBron scaled it 6x.

If you have any predictable long-term income stream — a contract, royalties, recurring revenue — there is a version of this available. The question is whether you are thinking about it.

The perfume tour works like a horoscope — but with a 99% margin product waiting at the end

Sam was mid-story about Asia Grant cold-reading him on the tour — You are a masculine guy. Very Midwestern masculine values, stoicism, leadership, timelessness. Therefore, this one would be perfect. — and Shaan interrupted: I wrote horoscope but better.

The psychology is identical to tarot or astrology. People pay freely to be told something flattering and specific about themselves. The cold read works on everyone. I can say that to any guy — you are a masculine guy but you do have a soft side for the people that matter — and they are like, yes, that is so true.

The difference: the horoscope sells the reading, which is essentially free. The perfume tour delivers the same identity flattery and then hands you a physical product. Here is water with two drops of oil and 99% profit margins — way better than what the horoscope person sells, which is the reading. Sam almost paid $1,200.

The sequence is the whole insight. Make the customer feel deeply understood first. Then the product recommendation lands not as a transaction but as a logical extension of who they already are. That is the Slack We Don't Sell Saddles Here move, compressed into a ninety-minute walking tour.

Dolly turned down Elvis, kept her song, and made tens of millions when Whitney sang it decades later

Elvis wanted to record I Will Always Love You. His condition: majority ownership of the song. Dolly said no.

Elvis was like, no no no, I need to own most of it, I am Elvis, I am going to blow this thing up. And she turns him down.

She kept the song, sang it herself, it did well. Then in the nineties, Whitney Houston recorded it for The Bodyguard — the best-selling movie soundtrack of all time — and Dolly heard it on the radio and broke down. Not from loss. From awe at what Whitney did with it.

Because she owned it, every spin earned her royalties. In the nineties she made like tens of millions in royalties just off Whitney Houston's version of I Will Always Love You. And she wrote I Will Always Love You and Jolene in the same night. Both became standards. Both stayed hers.

Shaan's read: she understood the value of her music in a way most artists do not. Most take the guaranteed cash deal and permanently surrender the compounding upside. The asset is almost always worth more than the biggest buyer's first offer — you just cannot know which vehicle will make it explode until it does.

Genuine enthusiasm is a competitive moat — because a competitor who does not feel it cannot fake it forever

Sam did not care about perfume before the tour. He was ready to drop $1,200 on a bottle before he caught himself. That is the structural power of Asia Grant's enthusiasm. It is contagious though, right? Shaan confirmed it before Sam finished the sentence.

Nick Gray grew Museum Hack to $2.9M in revenue by being the most enthusiastic museum tour guide anyone had ever met. His hook: I am going to show you five pieces of art I would love to steal today. Charged $200 for tours that were technically free. Sold the business. Then reinvented as the two-hour cocktail party guy. What is Nick's edge is that he just is more enthusiastic about two-hour cocktail parties than anyone else on Earth.

The reframe that matters: it is less of getting yourself to do something as it is giving yourself permission and trusting that that is a thing you can lean into.

You already have the enthusiasm. You are sandbagging it. The niche obsession you have been understating at dinner parties — the one that feels too weird to lead with — is exactly the thing a competitor cannot replicate if they do not feel it. Stop sandbagging.

The generic excellence era is ending — specific obsession is becoming the only durable moat

As content flattens every market and AI lowers the floor on competence, the one thing that cannot be commoditized is caring about something more than anyone else on earth. The horse people, the perfume guide, the sushi chef who spent a decade building an Instagram before opening eight chairs in a basement — they all won before they launched, because the audience was already theirs.

The real question for anyone building something now is not how do I scale this. It is am I the only person on earth who cares about this enough to build it.

Specific obsession is not a personality quirk. It is the whole moat.


Topics: entrepreneurship, personal branding, content strategy, niche business, IP ownership, wealth strategy, Dolly Parton, LeBron James, experiential business, media

Frequently Asked Questions

What does this work argue about building wealth?
This work argues that building wealth comes from creating a personal monopoly—being the only one offering something specific—rather than trying to be the best at a generic skill. The author uses examples like a perfume tour guide, horse blogger, and LeBron James to show how finding your unique niche can be far more profitable than a traditional corporate career. The core insight emphasizes that success depends on differentiation through specificity, not generic excellence, allowing individuals to build valuable businesses around their unique interests.
What are the key takeaways from this work?
Personal monopoly beats generic excellence—the core message is to be the only one, not the best one. The work emphasizes that "Your in-person service is just raw material — the content brand is the real business." It stresses finding passionate audiences who deeply care about their niche (like horse owners). The Dolly Parton example illustrates the importance of IP: "Dolly turned down Elvis, kept her IP, and made tens of millions when Whitney sang it." Finally, the work teaches financial literacy: "LeBron borrowed $300M tax-free against his Nike contract — debt isn't income."
What real examples illustrate the personal monopoly concept?
The work illustrates the concept through three examples: a perfume tour guide, a horse blogger, and LeBron James, each showing how finding a unique niche generates more wealth than generic excellence. The perfume guide monetized her expertise into a content brand; the horse blogger built an audience around a specific passion. The Dolly Parton example reinforces IP importance: she refused an Elvis opportunity to keep ownership rights, and when Whitney Houston later recorded her song, the deal generated tens of millions for Dolly.
Can you make money from a weird or unconventional hobby?
Yes, the work's central argument is that your unconventional hobby can be highly profitable if you build a personal monopoly around it. Rather than competing to be the best at something generic, the strategy is to "be the only, not the best." Success depends on identifying audiences deeply passionate about that specific niche who will pay for your unique perspective. The work emphasizes finding loyal audiences and building a content brand rather than just offering in-person services, turning your weird hobby into sustainable wealth.

Read the full summary of Proof that your weird hobby might be worth more than your corporate job on InShort